Dynamic knowledge graph-driven competency evolution framework: an intelligent integrated training approach to bridge educational fragmentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16949068Keywords:
undergraduate-graduate integrated training, dynamic knowledge graph, three-stage goal-oriented, four-dimensional collaboration, talent training system, innovative capability cultivationAbstract
To tackle issues such as academic system fragmentation, curriculum repetition, and delayed talent development cycle in traditional segmented training, this paper explores the construction of a dynamic knowledge graph-driven “Three-Stage Goal-Oriented” undergraduate-graduate (UG-G) integrated training system. Through literature analysis and empirical research conducted at Beijing Institute of Technology’s “Xu Teli Talent Class”, the paper proposes a four-dimensional collaborative model encompassing of curriculum, practice, capability and management. The research findings indicate that this system, leveraging the cross-stage mapping and intelligent adaptation of knowledge graphs, reduces curriculum repetition rates, enhances student research engagement, and improves the efficiency of translating outcomes into practical applications. This effectively addresses the “capability vacuum” and resource waste issues inherent in segmented education. In the future, the optimization efforts will focus on deepening dynamic capability portrait driven by AI to achieve “one person, one policy” training, increasing participation rates in interdisciplinary virtual teaching and research offices to over 50%, expanding the coverage of digital ideological and political education cases to 70% within three years, and establishing a flexible credit banking system integrated with AI ethics. Meanwhile, the study recommends that educational departments issue technical standards for this integrated training, universities establish cross-departmental collaborative mechanisms, and enterprises co-develop dynamic project pools. A comprehensive evaluation system that integrates ideological and political education with professional development should also be established. This research provides a systematic solution for cultivating national strategic talents and holds significant has important theoretical and practical values for the supply-side reform of higher education.
Downloads
References
Li L. Research on the integration of industrialization and informatization to promote industrial economic transformation and upgrading. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization. 2023;13(8):97-99.
Wang S. Exploring the path of Chinese higher education reform in the context of the new technological revolution. Renming Luntan·Xueshu Qianyan. 2023;(18):14-21.
Statistical communiqué of the 2023 national education development. [Accessed 21 May 2025] Available from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202410/t20241024_1159002.html .
Shi Y, Yu Y, Liu H., et al. Research on the integrated undergraduate-graduate talent training model towards ability enhancement in the context of new engineering. Journal of Higher Education. 2023;9(11):148-152.
Zhang L. Analysis of the pros and cons and countermeasures of the integrated undergraduate, master’s, and PhD talent training model. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education. 2015;(6):13-16.
Xiong L, Li Z. Exploring the innovative talent training model of undergraduate-master’s-PhD integration. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education. 2012; (1):11-15.
Ministry of Education, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance-Opinions on Accelerating the Reform and Development of Graduate Education in the New Era. [Accessed 2 June 2025] Available from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/202009/t20200921_489271.html.
Xing X. Tsinghua’s “Qian class”: Daring to break barriers—exploring the practice of cultivating first-class innovators in Tsinghua University’s Qian Xuesen mechanics class. Educator. 2022; (13):11-13.
Huang M, Wang J, Xiao W. Research on the “integrated undergraduate, master’s, and PhD” training model in the context of new engineering. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition). 2019; 21(06):171-176.
Trow M. Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education; 1974.
Engeström Y. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work. 2001;14(1):133-156. [Accessed 6 June 2025] Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13639080123238
Lattuca LR, Stark JS. Shaping the college curriculum: academic plans in context. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Liu Y. Modernization of graduate education governance: background, basic framework, and action strategies. Academic Degrees & Postgraduate Education. 2020; (11):18-24.
Jin M, Wang X, Xu G, et al. Exploring the mechanism and model of integrated undergraduate-graduate talent training. Journal of Higher Education. 2023; 10(35): 63-66.
Liu J, Xu M. Dilemmas and reconstruction of the integrated PhD training model. Journal of Graduate Education. 2017; (2):47-51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 He Chen, Ling Chen, Mei E, Lu Cheng, Hongwen He, Fang Deng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.