Effects of research service on public learning and research agenda in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5783374Keywords:
research service, science, industry, learning, R&D, public politicAbstract
Cooperation between science and industry is crucial for the economic and social development of a country and the effects it generates on public research depend on the specific collaboration scheme. This paper investigates the effects that research service can generate in public research activity, based on the contributions that industry makes and the way in which they are linked to public learning and its research agenda. For this, a qualitative methodology is used, based on the multiple case study method, which is carried out in three sectors, agrobiotechnology, biopharmaceutical and nanotechnology, of a developing country like Argentina. The main findings include the identification of four different categories within the service, the presence of benefits for the public part in terms of learning and agenda in two of them, and the possibility of a complementary relationship between this scheme and joint research.
Downloads
References
Caloghirou Y, Giotopoulos I, Kontolaimou A, Korra E, Tsakanikas A. Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter? Research Policy. 2021; 50(3): 104195.
Mascarenhas C, Ferreira JJ, Marques C. University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy. 2018; 45(5):708-718.
D’Este P, Ramos-Vielba I, Woolley R, Amara N. How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy. 2018; 45(6): 752-763.
Fini R, Rasmussen E. Siegel D, Wiklund J. Rethinking the commercialization of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2018; 32(1): 4-20.
Verre V, Milesi D, Petelski N. Science-Industry Cooperation: What are the Benefits for the Public Part? Evidence from Argentine Biopharmaceutical Sector. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 2021; 18(3):1-22.
Nelson R. (Ed.). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993
Freeman C. Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2004; 13(3):541-569.
Meyer-Krahmer F, Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy. 1998; 27(8):835-851.
Schartinger D, Rammer C, Fischer MM, Frohlich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy. 2002; 31(3):303-328.
Vicente-Saez R, Martinez-Fuentes C. Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of business research. 2018; 88: 428-436.
Bogers M, Chesbrough H, Moedas C. Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California management review. 2018; 60(2):5-16.
Perkmann M, Salandra R, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Hughes A. Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy. 2021; 50(1):104-114.
Compagnucci L, Spigarelli F. The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020; 161: 120284.
Perkmann M, West J. Open science and open innovation: sourcing knowledge from universities. En: Link AN, Siegel DS, Wright M (Eds.), The Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014. p.41–74.
Arza V, Carattoli M. Personal ties in university-industry linkages: A case-study from Argentina. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2017; 42:814-840.
Ankrah S, Al-Tabbaa O. Universities–industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2015; 31:387-408.
D’Este P, Llopis O, Rentocchini F, Yegros A. The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction. Research Policy. 2019; 48:103799.
Rentocchini F, D'Este P, Manjarrés-Henríquez L, Grimaldi R. The relationship between academic consulting and research performance: Evidence from five Spanish universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2014; 32:70-83.
Callaert J, Landoni P, Van Looy B, Verganti R. Scientific yield from collaboration with industry: The relevance of researchers’ strategic approaches. Research Policy. 2015; 44:990-998.
Garcia R, Araújo V, Mascarini S, Santos E, Costa A. How long-term university industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation. 2020; 22:56-70.
Van Looy B, Callaert J, Debackere K. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy. 2006;35:596-608.
Stake R. Investigación con estudios de caso. Madrid: Ediciones Morata; 1995.
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. California: Sage Publications; 2009.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimiro Verre, Darío Milesi, Natalia Petelski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
scholar.google.com.cu
