Entrepreneurial industrial design: asserting projectual autonomy beyond neoliberal logics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17754837Keywords:
discursive culture, industrial design, entrepreneurial ecosystem, projectual sovereignty, Province of Buenos Aires, National University of La PlataAbstract
Entrepreneurship in industrial design entails the convergence and conflict of two distinct cultural logics: that of design and that of business. This self-organized mode of professional practice, increasingly prevalent in contemporary life, is shaped by a dominant ideological infrastructure rooted in global centers, which promotes so-called “success stories” based on economic performance. Such narratives often marginalize alternative practices and influence designers’ professional expectations, limiting the imagination of divergent or locally rooted trajectories. This article, derived from doctoral research, explores alternative ways of understanding entrepreneurship in design by analyzing the discursive cultures adopted by industrial designers and how they reinterpret entrepreneurial activity in specific territorial contexts. The study is grounded in a multiple case analysis of eight entrepreneurial initiatives developed between 2009 and 2019 by graduates of the Faculty of Arts at the National University of La Plata, within the Buenos Aires Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (EEB). Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews with designers and key informants. It is framed by an integrated analytical model that considers three interrelated dimensions: the designer-entrepreneur, the enterprise, and the ecosystem in which it unfolds. Through this lens, the study reconstructs entrepreneurial trajectories and examines how designers negotiate the intersection of professional identity, local context, and personal life projects. The findings highlight the ways in which designers articulate critical forms of self-organization, resisting hegemonic market logics and pursuing what the study terms projectual sovereignty—an autonomous and context-sensitive way of designing and living.
Downloads
References
Best K. The fundamentals of design management. London: Bloomsbury; 2010.
Kimbell L. Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture. 2011;3(3):285–306. 1 [cited 2025 Jul 24] https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
Papanek V. Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. New York: Pantheon Books; 1972.
Margolin V. The politics of the artificial: Essays on design and design studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.
Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City (NY): Doubleday Anchor Books; 1959.
Butler J. Bodies that matter. London: Routledge; 2017.
Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing. In: Designerly ways of knowing and thinking. London: Springer; 2025. [cited 2025 Jul 26] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7541-4_1
Galán MB. Diseño y complejidad en la cátedra de Metodología de la Carrera de Diseño Industrial. Huellas. 2008;(6):22–39. 1 [cited 2025 Jul 23] Available from: https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/2520
D’Amico E. Diseño industrial y cultura discursiva: iniciativas emprendedoras de egresados/as de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata en el ecosistema bonaerense (2009–2019) [PhD thesis]. La Plata (AR): Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2024. 1 [cited 2025 Jul 24] Available from: https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/173059
Fernández S, Bonsiepe G, coordinadores. Historia del Diseño en Latinoamérica y El Caribe. São Paulo: Blücher; 2008.
Devalle V, Garone Gravier M, editors. Diseño latinoamericano. Diez miradas a una historia en construcción. Bogotá: Utadeo; 2020.
Escobar A. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press; 2018.
Manzini E. Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2015.
Akama Y, Light A, Kamihira T. Expanding participation to design with more-than-human concerns. In: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 – Participation(s) Otherwise – Volume 1. New York: ACM; 2020. p. 1–11.
Foucault M. Seguridad, territorio, población. Madrid: AKAL; 2008.
Bröckling U. The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. London: SAGE; 2015.
Han B. Psicopolítica. Barcelona: Herder; 2014.
Lorey I. State of insecurity: Government of the precarious. London: Verso Books; 2015.
Tonkinwise C. Design for transitions—From and to what? Design Philos Pap. 2015;13(1):85–92. [cited 2025 Jul 23] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686
Dubet F. La época de las pasiones tristes: De cómo este mundo desigual lleva a la frustración y el resentimiento, y desalienta la lucha por una sociedad mejor. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores; 2020.
Sennett R. The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2009.
Akama Y, Yee J. Seeking stronger plurality: Intimacy and integrity in designing for social innovation [conference paper]. Cumulus Hong Kong 2016 – Open Design for E‑very‑Thing; 2016 Nov 21; Hong Kong. p. 173–80.
von Borries F. Proyectar mundos: una teoría política del diseño. Santiago: Ediciones/metales pesados; 2019.
Montero L. El diseño de nosotros mismos: una lectura filosófica del diseño. Madrid: Experimenta; 2020.
Ingold T. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge; 2021.
Gatto E. Futuridades. Santiago: Casagrande; 2019.
Frayling C. Research in art and design. RCA Research Papers. 1993;1(1).
Koskinen I, Zimmerman J, Binder T, Redström J, Wensveen S. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Burlington (MA): Morgan Kaufmann; 2011.
D’Amico E, Del Giorgio Solfa F. Diseño y emprendimiento en ecosistemas socio culturales, económicos y espaciales. In: Sosa Compeán LB, Rivera Castillo S, Luna Rodríguez S, Molina González M, editors. Diseño moviendo al mundo. Interacciones, interrelaciones, interconexiones. Monterrey: Labýrinthos-Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; 2024. p. 137–54. 1 [cited 2025 Jul 25] Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10915/170520
Kvale S. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1996.
Welter F. Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 2011;35(1):165–84.
Sarasvathy SD. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(2):243–63.
Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1995.
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2018.
Erbes A, Girándola S. Estructura productiva y dinámica empresarial en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2019.
Manzini E. Habitar la proximidad. Ideas para la ciudad de los 15 minutos. Madrid: Experimenta; 2023.
Fuad-Luke A. Design activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. London: Earthscan; 2009.
Bonsiepe G. Reflections on a manifesto for design education 2011. In: Icograda Design Education Manifesto. Taipei: Icograda; 2011.
Galán MB. Diseño, Proyecto y Desarrollo: Miradas del período 2007–2010 en Argentina y Latinoamérica. Buenos Aires: Wolkowicz; 2011.
Bonsiepe G (CyADtv). Diseño ¿Disciplina social y utópica? [Internet]. YouTube; 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OArwPWQsGok
Urteaga E. Sociología de las profesiones: una teoría de la complejidad. Lan Harremanak. 2011;(18):169–98. https://doi.org/10.1387/lan-harremanak.2812
Del Giorgio Solfa F, D’Amico E. Complejidad y obstáculos del ecosistema emprendedor argentino: El lado B de un sueño emprendedor. In: XIII Jornadas de Sociología: Las cuestiones de la Sociología y la Sociología en cuestión; 2019 Jul; Buenos Aires: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. 1 [cited 2025 Jul 28] Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/94494
Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA). Definition of designpreneur [Internet]. IDSA; [cited 2025 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.idsa.org/
Correa ME. La lucha por la legitimidad. Estudio del campo profesional del Diseño Industrial a la luz de la teoría de Pierre Bourdieu. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación. 2020;(88). 1 [cited 2025 Jul 30] Available from: https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi88.3803
Tharp B, Tharp S. Discursive design: Critical, speculative, and alternative things. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2019.
Lupo E. Slow Design: Cultivar cultura y sensorialidad en la forma y en el uso de los artefactos. Temes de Disseny. 2012;(28):44–55.
Dunne A, Raby F. Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2013.
Sforzi F. Del distrito industrial al desarrollo local. In: Rosales Ortega R, editor. Desarrollo local: Teoría y prácticas socioterritoriales. México DF: Miguel Ángel Porrúa; 2007. p. 27–50.
Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies. 2005;39(1):61–74.
Sforzi F. Rethinking the industrial district: 35 years later. Investigaciones Regionales. 2015;32:11–29.
Fuad-Luke A. Slow design. In: Ehrloff M, Marshall T, editors. Design dictionary: Perspectives on design terminology. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2008. p. 361–3.
Ahmed S. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press; 2006.
Santos BS. Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Montevideo: Trilce; 2010.
Ahmed S. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke University Press; 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Enrique D’Amico, Federico Del Giorgio Solfa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
